|
Introduction
In the majority of patients with epilepsy, seizures
can be well controlled with appropriate medication.
However, current estimates indicate that 20 - 30% of
patients with epilepsy are refractory to all forms of
medical therapy. These medically intractable patients
are candidates for surgical treatment in an attempt to
achieve better seizure control. Another group of
patients who might benefit are those whose seizures may
be relatively well controlled but who have certain
characteristic presentations or lesions that strongly
suggest surgical intervention might be curative.
Overall, the single most important determinant of a
successful surgical outcome is patient selection.
This requires detailed presurgical evaluation to
characterize seizure type, frequency, site of onset,
psychosocial functioning and degree of disability in
order to select the most appropriate treatment from a
variety of surgical options.
Definitions
There are many types of seizures and different
forms of epilepsy. A seizure is defined as a
paroxysmal, self-limited change in behaviour associated
with excessive electrical discharge from the central
nervous system. Epilepsy is defined as a
condition of recurrent seizures and medical
intractability as recurrent seizures despite optimal
treatment under the direction of an experienced
neurologist over a two to three year period.
In the past, seizures have been classified based
upon their clinical manifestations which had some
relevance for patients and physicians but was of limited
diagnostic or prognostic value. According to this
classification, an epileptic disorder is defined as
either being generalized, partial (focal) or
undetermined.
Primary generalized
seizures start as a disturbance in both hemispheres
synchronously without evidence of a localized onset. The
manifestations of these seizures tend to be major motor
seizures of a tonic, clonic, tonic-clonic, myoclonic or
atonic type. They also include minor events of the petit
mal (absence) type.
Partial
forms of epilepsy start in a focal area of the brain and
may remain localized without alteration of
consciousness. These events are referred to as
simple partial seizures and the symptoms vary
with the area of the brain affected. If the event
spreads and alters consciousness it is referred to as a
complex partial seizure. If the
event spreads further and leads to a major motor seizure
it is referred to as a secondarily generalized
seizure and may be quite difficult to
distinguish from the primary generalized forms. Partial
seizures often arise from the limbic structures of the
temporal and frontal lobes but can occur from any
cortical region and are often quite refractory to
medical therapy alone. In general, patients with
partial seizure disorders are the most amenable to
surgical intervention.
A second classification divides the clinical
epilepsies into idiopathic, symptomatic and
syndromic forms based upon their presumed
etiologies..
Idiopathic
forms include some of the generalized seizure types that
may have familial patterns but without a prominent
genetic component such as simple febrile convulsions of
childhood.
Symptomatic forms are those caused by a recognized
central nervous system (CNS) lesion. Included in this
type are cases of known structural pathology, metabolic
abnormalities or neurodegenerative processes.
Syndromic
forms include disorders that may be idiopathic or
symptomatic but seem to follow a clear and predictable
course. These include childhood and juvenile absence
epilepsies, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and the Lennox-Gastaut
Syndrome. The ability to place a patient in one or
another of the syndromic categories has the advantage of
providing a basis for predicting long term
prognosis.
From a surgical point of view however, dividing
the seizure types into either generalized or focal
appears to be the most useful. This is because most
surgical decisions are based upon defining those
seizures that originate in one focal area of the brain
and localizing that area as a prelude to resection.
Presurgical Evaluation
The goal of epilepsy surgery is to identify an
abnormal area of cortex from which the seizures
originate and remove it without causing any significant
functional impairment. The primary components of the
presurgical evaluation includes a detailed clinical
history and physical examination, advanced neuro-imaging,
video-EEG monitoring, neuropsychological testing and
assessment of psychosocial functioning. The major
surgical questions one hopes to answer with this
evaluation are:
1) Are the seizures focal or generalized .
2) If focal, are they temporal or extratemporal in
origin.
3) Is there a lesion associated with the seizures
.
4) If surgery is undertaken what functional
deficits, if any, might be anticipated.
Clinical Features
The presurgical evaluation of a patient with
medically intractable epilepsy begins with a complete
history and physical examination. One attempts to
classify the different kinds of seizures as well as the
frequency, severity and duration of each type. The
clinical semiology of these events can yield important
localizing information to the experienced clinician. It
is also important to determine the age of onset,
response to treatment and familial tendency to seizures.
The pregnancy and delivery history is helpful in
assessing congenital or early acquired abnormalities.
Other past medical history of significance would include
a history of febrile seizures, head injury or
intracranial infection. An assessment of the adequacy of
medication trials must also be made to ensure that the
patient is truly refractory to medical therapy. On
examination, the clinician looks for obvious asymmetries
of development compatible with an early structural CNS
lesion and focal neurologic or cognitive abnormalities
suggestive of acquired disease.
Neuro-imaging
Modern neuroimaging is crucial to surgical decision
making. In the past, skull x-rays, ventriculograms and
computerized tomography (CT) scans demonstrated indirect
evidence of cerebral pathology in the form of focal or
diffuse atrophy or space-occupying lesions. Recently,
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has replaced CT
scanning as the imaging study of choice to evaluate
patients with epilepsy. MRI is an extremely sensitive
tool that can detect abnormalities of the brain with
exceptional anatomical detail. This has been especially
true for detecting focal atrophy ( e.g. hippocampal
atrophy ), indolent gliomas, cortical dysplasias,
cerebral gliosis and small structural lesions of the
neocortex. Functional imaging attempts to visualize
alterations in cerebral metabolism using Positron
Emission Tomography (PET) and Single Photon
Emission Computerized Tomography (SPECT). These
studies reveal epileptic areas as hypometabolic between
seizures and hypermetabolic during seizures. Although
they lack the spatial resolution of MRI, PET and SPECT
can play an important role in the localization of
abnormal cortex.
Electroencephalographic (EEG) Investigation
Electroencephalographic (EEG) investigation remains
the most important aspect of the presurgical evaluation.
Analysis of unselected EEG activity between events
(interictal ) or of specific activity during events
(ictal ) can provide evidence of focal electrical
dysfunction. While certain interictal EEG abnormalities
(spike and slow wave complexes) can be of localizing
value, it is considered extremely important to record
the EEG with concommitant videotape during the
spontaneous occurrence of the patient's events.
Neuropsychological Testing
Detailed neuropsychological testing is carried out
to reveal specific focal or multifocal cognitive
deficits that might be correlated with the neuroimaging
and EEG. This testing may help in localizing an abnormal
area of the brain but also serves as a comparison for
post-surgical evaluation. An intracarotid amobarbital
test is generally done as a prelude to surgery in order
to lateralize language and memory function and to avoid
neurocognitive deficits.
Psychosocial Assessment
Psychosocial evaluation is also extremely important
to assess current level of functioning and to ensure
realistic goals and attitudes are engendered in both the
patient and their family prior to surgery.
Diagnostic Surgical Options
When a primary epileptogenic region or seizure
focus is suspected but remains obscure despite
appropriate neuro-imaging and scalp (non-invasive )
video/EEG recordings, some form of implanted (invasive )
electrodes may be indicated. Intracranial electrodes
can be placed in areas not readily sampled by routine
surface electrodes and can give more precise EEG
information because of their proximity to discharging
areas of the brain and the lack of movement/muscle
artifact on the recordings. The diagnostic surgical
options of implanted electrodes include epidural,
subdural and intracerebral or depth electrodes.
Epidural electrodes
Epidural electrodes are used infrequently and
generally only for lateralization and approximate
localization of seizure onset. These electrodes are
placed through tiny openings in the skull with the
electrode contact resting on the dura to provide a high
amplitude EEG signal without muscle or movement
artifact. Because they do not penetrate the dura the
risk of infection is minor.
Subdural electrodes
These electrodes are placed subdurally on the
surface of the brain in the form of rectangular grids or
linear strips with flat metal contact points mounted in
flexible plastic. The grids require a craniotomy for
placement and therefore are limited to unilateral
application. The strip electrodes can be placed through
burr holes over the lateral convexity or under the
frontal or temporal lobes. The major advantage of
subdural electrodes is that they do not penetrate
cerebral tissue and can record from a relatively wide
area of the cortical surface.
Intracerebral depth electrodes
Intracerebral depth electrodes can be placed
stereotactically into deep cerebral structures with the
aid of CT, MR and angiography. Most centers employ
flexible electrodes with multiple contact points that
are placed through small holes in the skull and secured
with some form of cranial fixation. Electrodes are
usually targeted towards the amygdala, hippocampus,
orbital-frontal and cingulate regions and may be
inserted via a lateral or vertex approach. Depth
electrode investigation is generally indicated for
patients with bitemporal, bifrontal of frontal temporal
seizures and can localize a focal area of seizure
onset not possible with scalp recordings.
Surgical Decision Making
If the information obtained during the noninvasive
presurgical evaluation consistently points towards a
single area of the brain as being the site of seizure
onset, then the patient may be taken directly to surgery
for resection of that area. If neuro-imaging
demonstrates a well-characterized lesion (
i.e. unilateral hippocampal atrophy, cavernous angioma,
focal cortical dysplasia, etc.)
and is supported by the clinical features of the
seizures then surgery may be reasonable without the
general requirement for ictal EEG data.. However, if the
data gathered from the clinical examination, imaging
studies and noninvasive EEG evaluation are conflicting
or disparities arise in the presumed localization of the
seizure, then invasive intracranial monitoring is
warranted.
Therapeutic Surgical Options
Epilepsy surgery began as removal of gross
structural lesions of the brain. With the addition of
EEG data from preoperative and intraoperative
recordings, areas of removal expanded to include tissue
that was grossly normal in appearance but known to give
rise to epileptiform activity. Small areas of resection
were soon replaced by partial lobectomies and more
extensive cortical resection. Newer Surgical
options include Vagal Nerve Stimulation
and Gamma Knife Surgery.
General considerations
The primary objective of most epilepsy surgical
procedures is to accurately localize and then completely
excise the epileptogenic region without causing
cognitive or neurologic deficit. An important
determinant of the risk of surgery is the relationship
of the lesion to functionally important or "eloquent"
brain regions because injury to these "eloquent" areas
can cause irreversible neurologic impairment.
The newest method of localizing cortical function
is with functional MRI. This powerful
neuroimaging technique can create an anatomical and
functional model of an individual patient's brain. By
combining detailed anatomical information with precise
physiological information, fMRI is capable of creating a
structural and functional model of an individual's
brain.
Other non invasive cerebral mapping techniques that
have evolved to localize functionally important cortical
areas are magneto-encephalography (MEG) and positron
emission tomography (PET). Both can localize certain
cortical functions non-invasively .
Lesionectomy
With the advent of MRI, many patients with
recurrent seizures are now discovered to have small,
previously unrecognized lesions such as cavernous
angiomas, low grade astrocytomas, cortical
dysplasias and areas of focal atrophy
that are clearly the cause of their seizures. In
general, if these are located in extratemporal sites,
removal of the lesion and a small rim of surrounding
cortex is often successful in controlling seizures. If
lesions are located within the temporal lobe,
lesionectomy along with temporal lobectomy is carried
out including the mesial temporal structures in order to
yield good results in 80% of cases.
Temporal resections
The majority of temporal lobectomies, whether in
the dominant or nondominant hemisphere, can now be
safely performed under general anesthesia with or
without electrocorticography. It is important that the
mesial temporal structures are included in the removal.
Since almost 80% of temporal lobe seizures originate in
the mesial structures, several operative approaches have
been designed to reduce the amount of temporal neocortex
removed but still resect the amygdala and hippocampus.
Extra-temporal resections
Extra-temporal resections are much less commonly
performed with the majority being carried out in the
frontal lobe. En bloc standardized resections are not
generally suitable and most surgeons guide their
resections by detailed electrocorticography, both intra-
and extra-operatively along with detailed cortical
mapping. Frontal resections range from localized
topectomies to complete frontal lobectomies and must be
carefully individualized.
Hemispherectomy
Hemispherectomy is another form of cortical
excision that is limited to patients with congenital
hemiplegia, chronic encephalitis, hemi-megalencephaly or
Sturge-Weber syndrome. These patients tend to have
severe epilepsy with wide spread independent epileptic
discharges that often extend to the contralateral
(normal) hemisphere. It is only performed on patients
who have a dense hemianopsia and are already hemiplegic
with no fine motor activity on the affected side.
Corpus Callosotomy
Corpus callosotomy has been offered as an
alternative to hemispherectomy in epileptic patients
with congenital hemiplegia but the results are not as
good as with hemispherectomy. It is indicated when the
patient has a severely damaged hemisphere but motor,
sensory or visual function that would be valuable to
preserve. In general, however, corpus callosotomy is
most useful for those patients with generalized seizure
disorders and bilateral independent epileptic areas in
the frontal region. The seizures that respond best to
callosotomy are sudden falls or "drop attacks" with
injury to the patient.
Multiple Subpial Transections
In patients with seizure onset or epileptic zones
located in eloquent cortex, multiple vertical subpial
transections have been recommended as an alternative to
cortical resection. This technique leaves the vertical
columnar arrangement of the cortex intact thereby
preserving function but prevents spreading of the
seizure discharge in the horizontal plane to reduce
seizures.
Vagus nerve stimulation
Vagus nerve stimulation
(VNS)
is an established treatment of medically refractory
partial-onset seizures. Recent data from an
open-label multicenter pilot study also suggest a
potential clinical usefulness in the acute and
maintenance treatment of drug-resistant depressive
disorder. Despite the fact that surgery is needed to
implant the stimulating device, the option of long-term
use largely devoid of severe side effects would give
this treatment modality a privileged place in the
management of drug-resistant depression.
Vagus nerve stimulation is an effective, safe, and
well-tolerated treatment in patients with long-standing,
refractory partial-onset seizures, and may also be
beneficial in other types of seizures .
However, data indicate that the effect of VNS may be
delayed as long as a year and that patients continue to
improve during that time. Problems arising during the
implantation procedure are rare and manageable. VNS
might not be recommended to patients with cardiac
conduction disorder and with sleep apnea.
Gamma Knife Surgery
The first radiosurgical treatments for
epilepsy surgery were performed by Talairach in the
1950s; he implanted yttrium in patients with mesial
temporal lobe epilepsies (MTLEs) and no space-occupying
lesion. The patients had a high rate of seizure control,
provided that the seizure foci were confined to the
mesial structures of the temporal lobe.
Gamma knife surgery can reduce or eliminate seizures in patients with
medically refractory TLE. The treatment has a good level of safety. Neuropsychological testing
before and after radiosurgery shows no deterioration.
Significant changes occurs in the mesial temporal lobe
at the time of maximal radiation effect, 1 year after
treatment. Some patients need corticosteroids during
the period of maximal radiation-induced changes (9–14
months). The typical effect on seizures occurs at 9 to
12 months, just before the MRI changes. |